What kind of party makes it a selling point, to deny voters their democratic voice on a decision of such import as EU membership? What kind of voter thinks this denial of democracy is worthy of support?
You might be forgiven for thinking it would be the intervention of dusty old Deans and Chancellors overseeing ‘correct’ dissemination of opinion, but in fact the research revealed that the Student Unions, not the Universities, were actually the most restrictive.
Waiting on the outskirts of lawbreaking, hoping to gain the support of parliament before they are taken to court again, complies neither with the spirit nor the letter of this ruling, or existing privacy laws. Our police forces should be above reproach, the current situation shows they may not be.
Since taxation based on distance driven has already been achieved for many years we ought to question the suggestion of satellite tracking very closely. Using it for tax seems like overkill given the simplicity and reliability of the fuel duty approach. What other motive might there be for satellite tracking every vehicle?